![]() This addresses the deadlock of #41 but leaves another issue open: sequencing of listener invocations on publication/subscription matched events: there is a risk that the "unmatch" even precedes the "match" event from the application perspective, even though it is quite unlike in practice. Various ways of addressing it exist, but it looks like sequencing at the level of the "dds" entities suffers from similar risks. So better to just avoid the deadlock for now. Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <eb@ilities.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
include/ddsi | ||
src | ||
.fileids | ||
CMakeLists.txt |