address the last remaining warning by Clang's static analyzer
Signed-off-by: Erik Boasson <eb@ilities.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
274f7bfc95
commit
e55dc3703a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1945,10 +1945,9 @@ nn_reorder_result_t nn_reorder_rsample (struct nn_rsample_chain *sc, struct nn_r
|
||||||
reorder->n_samples++;
|
reorder->n_samples++;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else if (s->min == reorder->max_sampleiv->u.reorder.maxp1)
|
else if (((void) assert (reorder->max_sampleiv != NULL)), (s->min == reorder->max_sampleiv->u.reorder.maxp1))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/* note: sampleivtree not empty <=> max_sampleiv is set (compilers
|
/* (sampleivtree not empty) <=> (max_sampleiv is non-NULL), for which there is an assert at the beginning but compilers and static analyzers don't all quite get that ... the somewhat crazy assert shuts up Clang's static analyzer */
|
||||||
and static analyzers may warn) */
|
|
||||||
if (delivery_queue_full_p)
|
if (delivery_queue_full_p)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/* growing last inteval will not be accepted when this flag is set */
|
/* growing last inteval will not be accepted when this flag is set */
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue