Added some security documentation.
Signed-off-by: Martin Bremmer <martin.bremmer@adlinktech.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
91111af0ea
commit
514bf75276
6 changed files with 1052 additions and 0 deletions
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 47 KiB |
BIN
docs/manual/_static/pictures/dds_security_overview.png
Normal file
BIN
docs/manual/_static/pictures/dds_security_overview.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 48 KiB |
BIN
docs/manual/_static/pictures/pki_overview.png
Normal file
BIN
docs/manual/_static/pictures/pki_overview.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 71 KiB |
BIN
docs/manual/_static/pictures/rtps_message_structure.png
Normal file
BIN
docs/manual/_static/pictures/rtps_message_structure.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 14 KiB |
646
docs/manual/security.rst
Normal file
646
docs/manual/security.rst
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,646 @@
|
|||
.. _`DDS Security`:
|
||||
|
||||
############
|
||||
DDS Security
|
||||
############
|
||||
|
||||
CycloneDDS is (will be) compliant with The Object Management Group (OMG) DDS Security specification.
|
||||
|
||||
This specification defines the Security Model and Service Plugin Interface (SPI) architecture for
|
||||
compliant DDS implementations. The DDS Security Model is enforced by the invocation of these SPIs
|
||||
by the DDS implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: ./_static/pictures/dds_security_overview.png
|
||||
:width: 1000
|
||||
|
||||
The three plugins that comprise the DDS Security Model in CycloneDDS are:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**Authentication Service Plugin**
|
||||
|
||||
Provides the means to verify the identity of the application and/or user that invokes operations
|
||||
on DDS. Includes facilities to perform mutual authentication between participants and establish
|
||||
a shared secret.
|
||||
|
||||
**AccessControl Service Plugin**
|
||||
|
||||
Provides the means to enforce policy decisions on what DDS related operations an authenticated
|
||||
user can perform. For example, which domains it can join, which Topics it can publish or
|
||||
subscribe to, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Cryptographic Service Plugin**
|
||||
|
||||
Implements (or interfaces with libraries that implement) all cryptographic operations including
|
||||
encryption, decryption, hashing, digital signatures, etc. This includes the means to derive keys
|
||||
from a shared secret.
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
CycloneDDS provides built-in implementations of these plugins. Authentication uses PKI
|
||||
(Public Key Infrastructure) with a pre-configured shared Certificate Authority, RSA is used for
|
||||
authentication and Diffie-Hellman is used for key exchange. AccessControl use Permissions document
|
||||
signed by shared Certificate Authority. Cryptography uses AES-GCM (AES using Galois Counter Mode)
|
||||
for encryption and AES-GMAC for message authentication.
|
||||
|
||||
The plugins are accessed by the DDSI2 service when DDS Security is enabled by supplying the
|
||||
security configuration within the XML configuration or Participant QoS.
|
||||
|
||||
Security plugins are dynamically loaded where the locations are defined in CycloneDDS
|
||||
configuration or Participant QoS settings.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
*******************************************************
|
||||
Brief information about PKI (public key infrastructure)
|
||||
*******************************************************
|
||||
|
||||
The comprehensive system required to provide public-key encryption and digital signature services
|
||||
is known as a public-key infrastructure (PKI). The purpose of a PKI is to manage keys and
|
||||
certificates. By managing keys and certificates through a PKI, an organization establishes and
|
||||
maintains a trustworthy networking environment.
|
||||
|
||||
Public Key Cryptography: Each user has a key pair, generated during the initial certificate
|
||||
deployment process, that is comprised of a public key, which is shared, and a private key, which
|
||||
is not shared. Data is encrypted with the user’s public key and decrypted with their private key.
|
||||
Digital signatures, used for non-repudiation, authentication and data integrity, are also generated
|
||||
using public key cryptography.
|
||||
|
||||
**Identity Certificate**
|
||||
|
||||
This is an electronic document used to prove the ownership of a public key. The certificate
|
||||
includes information about the key, information about the identity of its owner (called the
|
||||
subject), and the digital signature of an entity that has verified the certificate's contents
|
||||
(called the issuer). If the signature is valid, and the software examining the certificate
|
||||
trusts the issuer, then it can use that key to communicate securely with the certificate's
|
||||
subject.
|
||||
|
||||
**Certificate Authority**
|
||||
|
||||
This issues user certificates and acts as the chief agent of trust. When issuing a certificate
|
||||
to a user, the CA signs the certificate with its private key in order to validate it. During
|
||||
electronic transactions the CA also confirms that certificates are still valid. Certificates
|
||||
may be revoked for various reasons. For example, a user may leave the organization or they may
|
||||
forget their secret passphrase, the certificate may expire or become corrupt. This process is
|
||||
usually accomplished through the use of a Certificate Revocation List (CRL) which is a list of
|
||||
the certificates that have been revoked. Only the certificates that have been revoked appear on
|
||||
this list.
|
||||
|
||||
**Subject of Identity Certificate**
|
||||
|
||||
This is the identity to be secured. It contains information such as common name (CN),
|
||||
organization (OU), state (ST) and country (C).
|
||||
|
||||
**Subject Name**
|
||||
|
||||
This is aka distinguished name and is the string representation of certificate subject.
|
||||
|
||||
ie: emailAddress=alice\@adlink.ist,CN=Alice,OU=IST,O=ADLink,ST=OV,C=NL
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
*************************
|
||||
PKI Usage in DDS Security
|
||||
*************************
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: ./_static/pictures/pki_overview.png
|
||||
:width: 1000
|
||||
|
||||
Alice and Bob are the DDS participants who have their private and public keys. Identitity
|
||||
Certificate Authority (ID CA) has its own self-signed certificate (IdentityCA in the diagram).
|
||||
ID CA gets Alice's subject information and public key and generates an IdentityCertificate for her.
|
||||
Alice's certificate includes her public key and certificate of ID CA; so that her certificate can
|
||||
be verified if it is really issued by ID CA.
|
||||
|
||||
Access Control is configured with governance and permissions files.
|
||||
Governance file defines the security behavior of domains and topics.
|
||||
Permissions file contains the permissions of the domain participant, topics, readers and writers,
|
||||
binds them to identity certificate by subject name (distinguished name).
|
||||
|
||||
Governance files and Permissions files are signed by Permission CA. Signed documents also
|
||||
contains Permissions CA certificate; so that they can be verified if they are really issued
|
||||
by Permissions CA.
|
||||
|
||||
Authenticated participants handshakes with each other and generates a shared key by Diffie-Hellman
|
||||
key exchange. This shared key is used for encrypting/decrypting data with AES.
|
||||
|
||||
During the handshake Alice checks Bob's certificate and Bob's Permissions file if they are really
|
||||
issued by the ID CA certificate and Permissions CA Certificate that **she** has. Also Bob checks
|
||||
Alice's certificate and Alice's Permissions file if they are really issued by the ID CA certificate
|
||||
and Permissions CA that **he** has.
|
||||
Permissions file can contain permissions for several identities; so subject name of identity
|
||||
certificate exist in permissions file to establish a binding between identity and its permissions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
*************
|
||||
Configuration
|
||||
*************
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: ./_static/pictures/dds_security_configuration_overview.png
|
||||
:width: 1000
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The configuration of DDS Security is split up into two parts.
|
||||
|
||||
- `Plugins Configuration`_
|
||||
- `Access Control Configuration`_
|
||||
|
||||
This section explains the configuration in details. However, you can see a concrete example on
|
||||
security section of Example Readme file.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Plugins Configuration`:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Plugins Configuration
|
||||
*********************
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: Update to reflect the configuration through QoS policies.
|
||||
|
||||
| CyclonDDS gets the plugin configuration from DDS2I configuration elements or the Participant QoS
|
||||
Policies as stated in the DDS Security specification.
|
||||
|
||||
| This behavior allows applications to use DDS Security without update. Only supplying a new
|
||||
configuration with DDS Security enabled is enough to switch from a non-secure to a secure
|
||||
deployment. However, the same DDS Security configuration is forced upon all the participants
|
||||
within the federation.
|
||||
|
||||
| The configuration options are bundled in the ``DDSSecurity`` configuration section in DDS2I.
|
||||
|
||||
| Every DDS Security plugin has its own configuration sub-section.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Authentication Properties`:
|
||||
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
Authentication Properties
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
| To authenticate CycloneDDS, it has to be configured with IdentityCertificate
|
||||
(DDSSecurity/Authentication/IdentityCertificate - see Configuration Guide - DDS Security).
|
||||
This IdentityCertificate is used to authenticate all participants of that particular
|
||||
CycloneDDS domain.
|
||||
|
||||
| Associated with the IdentityCertificate is the corresponding PrivateKey
|
||||
(DDSSecurity/Authentication/PrivateKey).
|
||||
The PrivateKey may either be a 2048-bit RSA or a 256-bit Elliptic Curve Key with
|
||||
a prime256v1 curve.
|
||||
|
||||
| IdentityCA (DDSSecurity/Authentication/IdentityCA) is the certificate of Identity Certificate
|
||||
Authority (CA) which is the issuer of the IdentityCertificate. The public key of the
|
||||
IdentityCA shall either be a 2048-bit RSA key or a 256-bit Elliptic Curve Key for the prime256v1
|
||||
curve. The identity_ca can be a self-signed certificate.
|
||||
|
||||
| Currently the IdentityCertificate, IdentityCA and PrivateKey should be a X509 document in pem
|
||||
format.
|
||||
It may either be specified directly in the configuration file or the configuration file should
|
||||
contain a reference to a corresponding file.
|
||||
|
||||
| Optionally the PrivateKey could be protected by a password (DDSSecurity/Authentication/Password).
|
||||
|
||||
| Furthermore the CycloneDDS configuration allows to configure a directory containing additional
|
||||
IdentityCA's
|
||||
which are used to verify the identity certificates that are received by remote instances
|
||||
(DDSSecurity/Authentication/TrustedCADirectory). This option allows to use more than one identity
|
||||
CA throughout the system. TrustedCADirectory is an extension to DDS Security specification; so it
|
||||
can not be used when communicating with other vendors.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Access Control Properties`:
|
||||
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
Access Control Properties
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
Governance Document (DDSSecurity/AccessControl/Governance),
|
||||
Permissions Document (DDSSecurity/AccessControl/Permissions) and
|
||||
Permissions CA Certificate (DDSSecurity/AccessControl/PermissionsCA) are required for access
|
||||
control plugin. See DDS Security section of Configuration Guide for property descriptions. They
|
||||
can be provided by data itself (with CDATA) or path to file on disk.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Cryptography Properties`:
|
||||
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
Cryptography Properties
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
Cryptography plugin has no property
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`Access Control Configuration`:
|
||||
|
||||
Access Control Configuration
|
||||
****************************
|
||||
|
||||
| Access Control configuration consists of Governance document and Permissions document.
|
||||
Both governance and permissions files must be signed by the Permissions CA in S/MIME format.
|
||||
Participants use their own permissions CA to validate remote permissions. So, all permissions CA
|
||||
Certificates must be same for all participants.
|
||||
|
||||
| The signed document should use S/MIME version 3.2 format as defined in IETF RFC 5761 using
|
||||
SignedData Content Type (section 2.4.2 of IETF RFC 5761) formatted as multipart/signed (section
|
||||
3.4.3 of IETF RFC 5761). This corresponds to the mime-type application/pkcs7-signature.
|
||||
Additionally the signer certificate should be be included within the signature.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
===================
|
||||
Governance Document
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
Governance document defines the security behavior of domains and topics. It is an XML document and
|
||||
its format is specified in OMG DDS Security Version 1.1 Section 9.4.1.2.3
|
||||
|
||||
The attributes that specified in Governance document must match with the remote one for
|
||||
establishing communication.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Protection Kinds
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
The domain governance document provides a means for the application to configure the kinds of
|
||||
cryptographic transformation applied to the complete RTPS Message, certain RTPS SubMessages, and
|
||||
the SerializedPayload RTPS submessage element that appears within the Data.
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: ./_static/pictures/rtps_message_structure.png
|
||||
:width: 300
|
||||
|
||||
The configuration allows specification of five protection levels: NONE, SIGN, ENCRYPT,
|
||||
SIGN_WITH_ORIGIN_AUTHENTICATION and ENCRYPT_WITH_ORIGIN_AUTHENTICATION.
|
||||
|
||||
**NONE**
|
||||
indicates no cryptographic transformation is applied.
|
||||
|
||||
**SIGN**
|
||||
indicates the cryptographic transformation shall be purely a message authentication code (MAC),
|
||||
that is, no encryption is performed.
|
||||
|
||||
**ENCRYPT**
|
||||
indicates the cryptographic transformation shall be an encryption followed by a message
|
||||
authentication code (MAC) computed on the ciphertext, also known as Encrypt-then-MAC.
|
||||
|
||||
**SIGN_WITH_ORIGIN_AUTHENTICATION**
|
||||
indicates the cryptographic transformation shall be purely a set of message authentication codes
|
||||
(MAC), that is, no encryption is performed. This cryptographic transformation shall create a
|
||||
first “common authenticationcode” similar to the case where Protection Kind is SIGN. In addition
|
||||
the cryptographic transformation shall create additional authentication codes, each produced with
|
||||
a different secret key. The additional MACs prove to the receiver that the sender originated the
|
||||
message, preventing other receivers from impersonating the sender.
|
||||
|
||||
**ENCRYPT_WITH_ORIGIN_AUTHENTICATION**
|
||||
indicates the cryptographic transformation shall be an encryption followed by a message
|
||||
authentication code (MAC) computed on the ciphertext, followed by additional authentication
|
||||
codes, Each of the additional authentication codes shall use a different secret key. The
|
||||
encryption and first (common) authentication code is similar to ones produced when the Protection
|
||||
Kind is ENCRYPT. The additional authentication codes are similar to the ones produced when the
|
||||
Protection Kind is SIGN_WITH_ORIGIN_AUTHENTICATION.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Participant attributes
|
||||
======================
|
||||
|
||||
**Allow Unauthenticated Participants**
|
||||
This is used for allowing communication with non-secure participants. If this option is enabled,
|
||||
secure participant can communicate with non-secure participant by only non-protected topics.
|
||||
|
||||
**Enable Join Access Control**
|
||||
If this option is enabled, remote participant permissions are checked if its subject name is
|
||||
allowed to create a topic anyhow.
|
||||
|
||||
**Discovery Protection Kind**
|
||||
Protection attribute for discovery communication when it is enabled for topic. Please see the
|
||||
DDS Security specification document for available options.
|
||||
|
||||
**Liveliness Protection Kind**
|
||||
Protection attribute for liveliness communication when it is enabled for topic. Please see the
|
||||
DDS Security specification document for available options.
|
||||
|
||||
**RTPS Protection Kind**
|
||||
Protection attribute for all messages on the wire. Please see the DDS Security specification
|
||||
document for available options. If encryption is selected for RTPS, there is no need to encrypt
|
||||
submessages (metadata_protection_kind) and payloads (data_protection_kind) which are defined in
|
||||
topic settings.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Topic Attributes
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
**Enable Discovery protection:**
|
||||
If enabled, discovery is protected according to Discovery Protection Kind attribute of
|
||||
corresponding participant.
|
||||
|
||||
**Enable Liveliness protection:**
|
||||
If enabled, liveliness is protected according to Liveliness Protection Kind attribute of
|
||||
corresponding participant.
|
||||
|
||||
**Enable Read Access Control:**
|
||||
If enabled, the permissions document is checked if the participant is allowed to create
|
||||
a datareader for the related topic.
|
||||
|
||||
**Enable Write Access Control:**
|
||||
If enabled, the permissions document is checked if the participant is allowed to create
|
||||
a datawriter for the related topic.
|
||||
|
||||
**Metadata protection Kind:**
|
||||
Protection attribute for submessages.
|
||||
|
||||
**Data protection Kind:**
|
||||
Protection attribute for data payload.
|
||||
|
||||
There are different settings for different domain ranges. The domain rules are evaluated in the
|
||||
same order as they appear in the document. A rule only applies to a particular DomainParticipant
|
||||
if the domain Section matches the DDS domain_id to
|
||||
which the DomainParticipant belongs. If multiple rules match, the first rule that matches is the
|
||||
only one that applies.
|
||||
|
||||
The topic access rules are evaluated in the same order as they appear within the
|
||||
<topic_access_rules> Section. If multiple rules match the first rule that matches is the only one
|
||||
that applies.
|
||||
|
||||
fnmatch pattern matching can be used for topic expressions including the following patterns
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`fnmatch pattern matching`:
|
||||
|
||||
+----------+----------------------------------+
|
||||
|Pattern |Meaning |
|
||||
+==========+==================================+
|
||||
| \* | matches everything |
|
||||
+----------+----------------------------------+
|
||||
| \? | matches any single character |
|
||||
+----------+----------------------------------+
|
||||
| [seq] | matches any character in seq |
|
||||
+----------+----------------------------------+
|
||||
| [!seq] | matches any character not in seq |
|
||||
+----------+----------------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
====================
|
||||
Permissions Document
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
The permissions document is an XML document containing the permissions of the domain participant
|
||||
and binding them to the subject name of the DomainParticipant as defined in the identity
|
||||
certificate. Its format is specified in OMG DDS Security Version 1.1 Section 9.4.1.3.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Validity period
|
||||
===============
|
||||
|
||||
It is checked before creating participant; expired permissions document results with DDSI shutdown.
|
||||
Validity period is also checked during handshake with remote participant; expired remote
|
||||
permissions document prevents communications to be established.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Subject Name
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
The subject name must match with Identity Certificate subject. It is checked during create
|
||||
participant and during handshake with remote participant. Use the following openssl command to get
|
||||
subject name from identity certificate:
|
||||
|
||||
``openssl x509 -noout -subject -nameopt RFC2253 -in <identity_certificate_file.crt>``
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Rules
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
DomainParticipant permissions are defined by set of rules.
|
||||
|
||||
The rules are applied in the same order that appear in the document. If the criteria for the rule
|
||||
matches the domain_id join and/or publish or subscribe operation that is being attempted, then the
|
||||
allow or deny decision is applied. If the criteria for a rule does not match the operation being
|
||||
attempted, the evaluation shall proceed to the next rule. If all rules have been examined without
|
||||
a match, then the decision specified by the “default” rule is applied. The default rule, if
|
||||
present, must appear after all allow and deny rules. If the default rule is not present, the
|
||||
implied default decision is DENY. The matching criteria for each rule specify the domain_id,
|
||||
topics (published and subscribed), the partitions (published and subscribed), and the data-tags
|
||||
associated with the DataWriter and DataReader.
|
||||
|
||||
For the grant to match there shall be a match of the topics, partitions, and data-tags criteria.
|
||||
This is interpreted as an AND of each of the criteria. For a specific criterion to match
|
||||
(e.g., <topics>) it is enough that one of the topic expressions listed matches (i.e., an OR of
|
||||
the expressions with the <topics> section).
|
||||
|
||||
`fnmatch pattern matching`_ can be used for topic expressions and partition expressions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Interactions with DDS Security
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
|
||||
DDS Security provides the responses through CycloneDDS error and info log. Users can get
|
||||
messages for:
|
||||
|
||||
- Configuration errors such as plugin library files, certificate files, governance and permissions
|
||||
files that can not be found on filesystem.
|
||||
- Permission errors such as denied permission for creating writer of a topic.
|
||||
- Attribute mismatch errors such as mismatches of security attributes between participants, topics,
|
||||
readers and writers.
|
||||
- Integrity errors such as Permissions file-Permissions CA and Identity Cert-Identity CA integrity.
|
||||
|
||||
Local subscription, publication and topic permission errors are written to error log.
|
||||
Remote participation, subscription and publication permission errors are written to info log as
|
||||
warning message.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Data Communication And Handshake Process
|
||||
*******************************************
|
||||
|
||||
Authentication handshake between participants starts after participant discovery.
|
||||
If a reader and a writer created during that period, their match will be delayed until after the
|
||||
handshake succeeds.
|
||||
This means, during the handshake process, volatile data will be lost, just like there is no reader.
|
||||
|
||||
After publication match, the encryption / decryption keys are exchanged between reader and writer.
|
||||
Best-effort data that are sent during this exchange will be lost, however reliable data will be
|
||||
resent.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DDS Secure Discovery
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
|
||||
Just like normal operation, DDSI will discover local and remote participants, topics, readers and
|
||||
writers.
|
||||
However, when DDS Security is enabled, it is more complex and will take a longer time (especially
|
||||
due to the handshaking that has to happen).
|
||||
|
||||
With every new node in the system, the discovery takes exponentially longer. This can become a
|
||||
problem if the system contains a number of slow platforms or is large.
|
||||
|
||||
The Security discovery performance can be increased quite a bit by using the DDSI
|
||||
Internal/SquashParticipants configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Proprietary builtin endpoints
|
||||
******************************
|
||||
|
||||
| The DDS standard contains some builtin endpoints. A few are added by the DDS Security
|
||||
specification. The behaviour of all these builtin endpoints are specified (and thus are be
|
||||
handled by the plugins that implement the DDS Security specification), meaning that they
|
||||
don't have to be present in the Governance or Permissions documents and the users don't
|
||||
have to be bothered with them.
|
||||
|
|
||||
| A few of these builtin endpoints slave according to the <discovery_protection_kind> within
|
||||
the Governance document. In short, related submessages are protected according to the value
|
||||
of <discovery_protection_kind>. This protects meta information that is send during the
|
||||
discovery phase.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
*******************
|
||||
DataTag Permissions
|
||||
*******************
|
||||
|
||||
| Data Tags provide an extra (optional) level of identification. This can mean f.i. that
|
||||
a certain reader is not allowed to read data from writer A but it is allowed to read from
|
||||
writer B (all the same topic).
|
||||
|
|
||||
| This optional feature is not yet supported.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
***************************
|
||||
External Plugin Development
|
||||
***************************
|
||||
|
||||
DDS Security consists of three plugins (authentication, cryptography and access control).
|
||||
CycloneDDS comes with built-in security plugins that comply with OMG DDS Security specification.
|
||||
The plugins are loaded in the run-time. However, you can also implement your own custom plugin by
|
||||
implementing the given API according to OMG DDS Security specification.
|
||||
You can implement all of the plugins or just one of them.
|
||||
|
||||
| The followings are the key points for implementing you own plugin:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Interface
|
||||
*********
|
||||
|
||||
Implement all plugin specific functions with exactly same prototype. Plugin specific function
|
||||
interfaces are in dds_security_api_access_control.h, dds_security_api_authentication.h and
|
||||
dds_security_api_cryptography.h header files accordingly.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Init and Finalize
|
||||
*****************
|
||||
|
||||
| A plugin should have an init and a finalize functions. plugin_init and plugin_finalize
|
||||
interfaces are given in dds_security_api.h header file and function should be same as in
|
||||
configuration file.
|
||||
| Init function is called once, just after the plugin is loaded. Finalize function is
|
||||
called once, just before the plugin is unloaded.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Inter Plugin Communication
|
||||
**************************
|
||||
|
||||
| There is a shared object (*DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandle*) within authentication and
|
||||
cryptography plugins. If you want to implement only one of them and use the builtin for the
|
||||
other one, you have to get or provide the shared object properly.
|
||||
| *DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandle* is the integer representation of
|
||||
*DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandleImpl* struct object. Cryptography plugin gets the
|
||||
*DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandle* from authentication plugin and casts to
|
||||
*DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandleImpl* struct. Then all needed information can be retieved
|
||||
through *DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandleImpl* struct:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandleImpl {
|
||||
DDS_Security_octet* shared_secret;
|
||||
DDS_Security_long shared_secret_size;
|
||||
DDS_Security_octet challenge1[DDS_SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION_CHALLENGE_SIZE];
|
||||
DDS_Security_octet challenge2[DDS_SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION_CHALLENGE_SIZE];
|
||||
|
||||
} DDS_Security_SharedSecretHandleImpl;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Error Codes
|
||||
***********
|
||||
|
||||
| Most of the plugin functions have parameter for reporting exception. The following exception
|
||||
codes should be used in the reported exception data according to the situation.
|
||||
dds_security_api_err.h header file contains the code and message constants.
|
||||
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| Code | Message |
|
||||
+=======+================================================================+
|
||||
| 0 | (OK) |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 100 | Can not generate random data |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 110 | Identity empty |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 111 | Participant Crypto Handle empty |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 112 | Permission Handle empty |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 113 | Invalid Crypto Handle |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 114 | Invalid argument |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 115 | Invalid Crypto token |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 116 | Invalid parameter |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 117 | File could not be found, opened or is empty, path: %s |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 118 | Unknown or unexpected transformation kind |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 119 | Message cannot be authenticated, incorrect signature |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 120 | Can not open trusted CA directory |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 121 | Identity CA is not trusted |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 122 | Certificate start date is in the future |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 123 | Certificate expired |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 125 | Certificate authentication algorithm unknown |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 126 | Failed to allocate internal structure |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 127 | Failed to parse PKCS7 SMIME document |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 128 | Property is missing: (%s) |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 129 | Permissions document is invalid |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 130 | Governance document is invalid |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 131 | Operation is not permitted in this state |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 132 | Remote permissions document is not available |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 133 | Certificate is invalid |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 134 | Certificate type is not supported |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 135 | Governance property is required |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 136 | Permissions CA property is required |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 137 | Can not parse governance file |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 138 | Can not parse permissions file |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 139 | Could not find permissions for topic |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 140 | Could not find domain %d in permissions |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 141 | Could not find domain %d in governance |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 142 | Could not find %s topic attributes for domain(%d) in governance|
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 143 | PluginClass in remote token is incompatible |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 144 | MajorVersion in remote token is incompatible |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 145 | Access denied by access control |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 146 | Subject name is invalid |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 147 | Permissions validity period expired for %s |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 148 | Permissions validity period has not started yet for %s |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 149 | Could not find valid grant in permissions |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 150 | Permissions of subject (%s) outside validity date: %s - %s |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| 151 | Unsupported URI type: %s |
|
||||
+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
.. EoF
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue